April 5, 2022

US FDA and Successful submission of traditional 510(k) 

US FDA and Successful submission of traditional 510(k)  

If you have an idea for a new medical device and want to sell that product in the US, you will need approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For class II devices, 510(k) is applicable whereas for class III devices, Pre Market Approval is required. For a 510(k) submission, before marketing a device, each submitter must receive an order, in the form of a letter from FDA which mentions that the device is substantially equivalent and the device can be marketed in the US. 

How is 510(k) different form Pre Market Approval (PMA)

510(k)PMA
The purpose is to provide evidence that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device that is already in the market.The purposes to provide the safety and efficacy of new device typically through clinical trials.
Typically, class II devices falls under this category.Typically, class III devices falls under this category.
Clinical trials are not mandatoryClinical trials are mandatory.
The timeline for 510(k) process is 90 days.The timeline for a PMA process is 180 days.

What is a 510(k) process?

A 510(k) submission is a pre-market notification that you must submit to the FDA to sell medical device products classified as medium risk in the US market. The submission provides regulators with technical, performance, and safety information on your new medical device.

The aim of your submission is to demonstrate the medical device you have developed is “substantially equivalent” to a product (known as a predicate device) that has already been approved for use in the US. The phrase “substantially equivalent” means your product must be, as a minimum, as effective and safe as the predicate device. If your 510(k) submission achieves this aim, the FDA will clear your product for sale in the US.

Until the submitter receives an order declaring a device SE, the submitter may not proceed to market the device. Once the device is determined to be SE, it can then be marketed in the U.S. The SE determination is usually made within 90 days and is made based on the information submitted by the submitter.

As FDA does not typically perform 510(k) pre clearance facility inspections. The submitter may market the device immediately after 510(k) clearance is granted. The manufacturer should be prepared for an FDA quality system (21 CFR 820) inspection at any time after 510(k) clearance.

Substantial equivalence

A device is substantially equivalent if, in comparison to a predicate it:

  • has the same intended use as the predicate; and
  • has the same technological characteristics as the predicate; or
  • has the same intended use as the predicate; and
  • has different technological characteristics and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness; and
  • the information submitted to FDA demonstrates that the device is as safe and effective as the legally marketed device.
C:\Users\Mithun\Desktop\Projects_KN\Case Studies\Reference\tumblr_fbcf1fc3b2ada0e52496c9de85e0fe4d_befe99f4_1280.jpg

Sections of a typical 510(k) dossier

Section 1.0 – Medical Device User Fee Cover Sheet (Form FDA 3601)

Section 2.0 – CDRH Premarket Review Submission Cover Sheet

Section 3.0 – 510(k) Cover Letter

Section 4.0 – Indications for Use Statement

Section 5.0 – 510(k) Summary

Section 6.0 – Truthful and Accuracy Statement

Section 7.0 – Class III Summary and Certification

Section 8.0 – Financial Certification or Disclosure Statement

Section 9.0 – Declarations of Conformity and Summary Reports

Section 10.0 – Executive Summary

Section 11.0 – Device Description

Section 12.0 – Substantial Equivalence Discussion

Section 13.0 – Proposed Labeling

Section 14.0 – Sterilization and Shelf Life

Section 15.0 – Biocompatibility

Section 16.0 – Software

Section 17.0 – Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety

Section 18.0 – Performance Testing – Bench

Section 19.0 – Performance Testing – Animal

Section 20.0 – Performance Testing – Clinical

Review Process

The review process of 510(k) submission is divided into two parts. They are

  • Acceptance review

Acceptance review takes up to 15days. In some cases, 510(k) is not accepted at the primary level. Refuse To Accept (RTA) is issued to the manufacturer. In such cases, more documentation required to validate the product.

  • Substantial review

The substantial review takes up to 60 days. At this stage, the approval body may ask for additional information. 

Timeline of communication for 510(k) review process

Upon review, when a decision is made, FDA will issue the decision letter to the submitter by email to the email address provided in the 510(k) cover letter. 

Following clearance of your device, you must list your product with the FDA. If this is your first time selling to the US market, you will need to register your company as well. You must also pay the annual establishment registration fee to maintain your company registration.

Conclusion

510k approval is easier if you ensure whatever is done is recorded from day one. Failing on the recording part makes it inconvenient and difficult to obtain 510(k) clearances.

To find out more about the 510(k) submission process and preparing the information and documentation that you need, please get in touch with a member of the KN consulting team.

References:

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-notification-510k/510k-submission-process

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-preparing-correct-submission/premarket-notification-510k

https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/fda-510-k-submission

https://www.emergobyul.com/resources/fda-510k-quick-answers

Other Resources
Uncategorized

Digital Health The categories of digital health include mobile health (mHealth), Health Information technology (IT), wearable devices, telemedicine, telehealth and personal medicine. Digital health has the potential to improve the ability to accurately diagnose and treat diseases which enhances the delivery of health care for the individual. The applications of these technologies range from general […]


January 26, 2023 | 4 mins Read
Regulatory compliance

National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) is responsible for the regulation of Medical devices and Pharmaceuticals in China. The predecessor to NMPA was founded in 1998, and renamed as State Food and Drug Administration in 2003. On September 1, 2018 China Food and Drug Administration was replaced by NMPA and it operates under the state jurisdiction […]


November 22, 2022 | 4 mins Read
Regulatory compliance

In today’s world of healthcare, technology plays an important role in the life cycle of medical devices and software has become an integral part of majority of products that serve both medical and non medical purposes. There are three types of medical devices related to software. Namely, Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), Software in […]


November 13, 2022 | 4 mins Read

Hop on this transformational journey with us.

Contact Us